Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jerome Kym vs Daniel Paty Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kym vs Paty analysis and find out who is favored!
Jerome Kym vs Daniel Paty Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kym 1 - 0 Paty
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kym has won 54.87% of points on their second serve, while Paty has won 56.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kym, in recent form, has won 52.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paty has won 46.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.93% and 36.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kym has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paty has saved 46.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kym has won 75% of matches played (W/L 36/ 12), with Paty winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 96/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/ 6), where as Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kym winning 1 times and Paty being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kym winning 2 and Paty winning 0. The last match between Kym and Paty was at the M25 Split, 20-04-2023, Second, Clay with Jerome Kym getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kym and Paty have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kym winning 0 times and Paty 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kym winning 0, and Paty 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kym has played against opponents with an average rank of 148.31 while Paty has played against players with an average rank of 136.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kym has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paty has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kym has converted 40.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paty has converted 44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
444
Rank
348
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
685
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
67% (98-49)
Career Total W/L
54% (110-95)
76% (26-8)
YTD W/L
67% (6-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jerome Kym | Daniel Paty |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (32/52) | 48% (31/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (26/32) | 55% (17/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (8/20) | 44% (15/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (33/65) | 35% (18/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jerome Kym | Daniel Paty |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (26/8) | 67% (6/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 75% (55/18) | 67% (12/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (407/286) | 55% (96/78) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (18/5) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.66 |
| Aces Total | 181 | 57 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:13 | 1:16:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.38 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1315/2064) | 59% (286/483) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (970/1315) | 78% (223/286) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (411/749) | 57% (112/197) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (109/270) | 44% (22/50) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (988/2314) | 40% (225/564) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (20/5) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 79% (26/33) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (26/25) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (26/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Arthur Gea
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Martin Krumich
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Norbert Gombos
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Jerome Kym
59%
(
79 of
133)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
15
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
47 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Berk Bugarikj
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Jerome Kym
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
35%
(
16 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tom Gentzsch
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Nico Hipfl
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Mariano Tammaro
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Matthias Ujvary
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tobias Smoliner
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Daniel Paty
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kym Vs Paty Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jerome Kym
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Paty
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
